From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] xfs: truncate vs page fault IO exclusion
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 04:24:48 -0800
Message-ID: <20150108122448.GA18034@infradead.org>
References: <1420669543-8093-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:51219 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752893AbbAHMYu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Jan 2015 07:24:50 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1420669543-8093-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

> This patchset passes xfstests and various benchmarks and stress
> workloads, so the real question is now:
> 
> 	What have I missed?
> 
> Comments, thoughts, flames?

Why is this done in XFS and not in generic code?