From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] fd/direct-io: introduce should_dirty for kernel aio Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 05:34:33 -0800 Message-ID: <20150125133433.GB19445@infradead.org> References: <1421163888-21452-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <1421163888-21452-3-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , Jens Axboe , Zach Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Maxim Patlasov , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Benjamin LaHaise , Omar Sandoval , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Ming Lei Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1421163888-21452-3-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:44:46PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > - if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ) > + if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ && dio->should_dirty) > bio_set_pages_dirty(bio); > > if (sdio->submit_io) > @@ -463,13 +464,14 @@ static int dio_bio_complete(struct dio *dio, struct bio *bio) > if (!uptodate) > dio->io_error = -EIO; > > - if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ) { > + if (dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ && dio->should_dirty) { I'd rather have a ->should_dirrty flag that means we need to call bio_check_pages_dirty, And set that either if we have a kernel iovec/bvec or dio->is_async && dio->rw == READ. But why would we even set this if writing from an iovec? > bio_check_pages_dirty(bio); /* transfers ownership */ > } else { > bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) { > struct page *page = bvec->bv_page; > > - if (dio->rw == READ && !PageCompound(page)) > + if (dio->rw == READ && !PageCompound(page) && > + dio->should_dirty) > set_page_dirty_lock(page); And this unk could also use some explanation.