From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 6/8] vfs: Add get_vfsmount_sb() function to get vfsmount from a given sb.
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 02:09:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150130020902.GG29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CADA3E.6050306@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 09:11:26AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> For the mounted ro case, that's not a problem, since if one instance
> is mounted ro,
> other instances are also mounted ro, so that's not a problem.
Not really.
root@satch:~# cd /tmp/
root@satch:~# mkdir /tm/a
root@satch:~# mount --bind /tmp/ /tmp/a
root@satch:~# mount --bind -o remount,ro /tmp/a
root@satch:~# mkdir /tmp/b
root@satch:~# mkdir /tmp/a/c
mkdir: cannot create directory '/tmp/a/c': Read-only file system
root@satch:~# stat /tmp/b /tmp/a/b
File: '/tmp/b'
Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 806h/2054d Inode: 257537 Links: 2
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2015-01-29 21:03:35.000000000 -0500
Modify: 2015-01-29 21:03:35.000000000 -0500
Change: 2015-01-29 21:03:35.000000000 -0500
Birth: -
File: '/tmp/a/b'
Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 directory
Device: 806h/2054d Inode: 257537 Links: 2
Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
Access: 2015-01-29 21:03:35.000000000 -0500
Modify: 2015-01-29 21:03:35.000000000 -0500
Change: 2015-01-29 21:03:35.000000000 -0500
Birth: -
root@satch:~#
IOW, /tmp and /tmp/a bear the same filesystem (one from /dev/sda6), the former
is mounted r/w, the latter - r/o.
> >Assuming that your superblock is guaranteed to stay alive and usable for
> >whatever work you are trying to do, what's wrong with sb_want_write()?
> Did you mean change the function name and it's parameter to
> sb_want_write(sb) and sb_drop_write(sb).
> That looks much better.
> But I'm a little worried about just using sb_start_write() and
> s_readonly_remount/s_flags to do the protection,
> will it be enough?
Protection against what? If superblock is r/w, it will stay r/w until you
do sb_drop_write(); if it's r/o, sb_want_write() will fail. There might be
any number of vfsmounts over superblock; attempt to get write access via
vfsmount will succeed only of both the vfsmount and superblock are r/w -
mnt_want_write() does sb_want_write() and fails if that has failed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1422498281-20493-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
2015-01-29 2:24 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 6/8] vfs: Add get_vfsmount_sb() function to get vfsmount from a given sb Qu Wenruo
2015-01-29 12:37 ` David Sterba
2015-01-29 15:23 ` Al Viro
2015-01-30 1:11 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-01-30 2:09 ` Al Viro [this message]
2015-01-30 2:20 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-01-30 0:52 ` Miao Xie
2015-01-30 1:44 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-01-30 2:02 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-01-30 3:22 ` Miao Xie
2015-01-30 3:30 ` Qu Wenruo
2015-01-30 2:14 ` Al Viro
2015-01-30 4:14 ` Miao Xie
2015-01-30 4:37 ` Al Viro
2015-01-30 5:34 ` Miao Xie
2015-01-30 6:15 ` Al Viro
2015-01-30 5:30 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150130020902.GG29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).