From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: fs: dax: do not build on ARC or SH Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:40:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20150223184025.GD2780@wil.cx> References: <5778538.KJ98x3yxkB@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5778538.KJ98x3yxkB@wuerfel> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:29:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The DAX implementation relies on the architecture to provide a working > copy_user_page() function, as reported by Michael Ellerman's kisskb > build bot: > > fs/dax.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_user_page' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 266:2 > > We already have a list of architectures that are known to be incompatible, > but the list is missing ARC and SH at the moment. Further, blackfin and > c6x also lack support for this function, but are already excluded because > they do not support MMU-based kernels. I've got a short list of patches for DAX; I'll add this one to the list. Have the maintainers of these architectures been notified that they're missing a core piece of kernel functionality?