From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: Lazytime feature bugs Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:52:58 -0500 Message-ID: <20150225145258.GB11217@thunk.org> References: <20150218131931.GA10424@quack.suse.cz> <20150224183103.GA13024@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel , Alexander Viro To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:35702 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752357AbbBYOxE (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:53:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:58:33AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > any reaction here? > > Ted? Al? Should we just revert or at least disable the 'lazytime' option? Sorry, I've been recovering from conference travel. Lazytime is not enabled by default, and except for ext4 it can't be enabled without changes to the mount command. I'll take a look at it in the next couple of days, and in the worst case we can disable it in fs/ext4/super.c relatively simple. - Ted