From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:30:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20150323193017.GA14179@infradead.org> References: <20150316201640.33102.33761.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150318132650.3336261c58829f49a9af8675@linux-foundation.org> <20150319134313.GF4003@linux.intel.com> <550C490E.1080708@redhat.com> <550EE4FE.1070009@plexistor.com> <55102EEB.2090401@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , Dan Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, Dave Hansen , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Rik van Riel Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55102EEB.2090401@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:19:07AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > There are two things going on here: > > 1) You want to keep using struct page for now, while there are > subsystems that require it. This is perfectly legitimate. > > 2) Matthew and Dan are changing over some subsystems to no longer > require struct page. This is perfectly legitimate. > > I do not understand why either of you would have to object to what > the other is doing. There is room to keep using struct page until > the rest of the kernel no longer requires it. *nod* I'd really like to merge the struct page based pmem driver ASAP. We can then look into work that avoid the need for struct page, and I think Dan is doing some good work in that direction.