From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmem: add a driver for persistent memory
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:32:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20150402093228.GB14209@lst.de>
References: <1427872339-6688-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1427872339-6688-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <551C0C5E.9080003@plexistor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <551C0C5E.9080003@plexistor.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 06:18:54PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> You might as well rw & WRITE also for the above pmem_do_bvec call.
> If there can be such problem than the rw == READ inside
> pmem_do_bvec will fail as well.

Might be worth to pass a bool to pmem_do_bvec, but we're getting into
serious bikeshed territory here..