From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e820 type Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:27:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20150406072743.GC1668@gmail.com> References: <1427872339-6688-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1427872339-6688-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1428077687.31093.120.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <1428094444.31093.122.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> <20150404094054.GA21027@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Toshi Kani , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers , Jens Axboe To: Yinghai Lu Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Toshi Kani wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 10:12 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Toshi Kani wrote: > >> > > On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 09:12 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> > > >> > should revert those end_of_ram change as attached. > >> > >> I confirmed that the pmem driver works with the change, and last_pfn is > >> updated as expected. > > > > Could someone please send the fix with a changelog, etc? > > > > Why just fold those change into that commit. Because we try to avoid doing rebases of otherwise tested trees, and because fixes will outline the thinking behind the code as well. Thanks, Ingo