From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/24] link_path_walk: kill the recursion
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:52:55 +0100
Message-ID: <20150420215255.GP889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20150420181222.GK889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <1429553588-24764-16-git-send-email-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CA+55aFwP_zR8ETgmX-AfpSzG+B6+FZnaJ+_DFiOmKxEAd5=tkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150420213247.GN889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CA+55aFw7_3DFbbY0==XOL_FFv28vpD-KphK+7nr7xaVVE7Twgg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFw7_3DFbbY0==XOL_FFv28vpD-KphK+7nr7xaVVE7Twgg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:41:31PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > A kilobyte would suffice for 32 levels.  _IF_ we go for "lift the restrictions
> > on nesting completely", sure, we want to switch to (on-demand) dynamic
> > allocation.
> 
> And no, we will *never* lift the recursion limit. Not for 1kB, not for
> 1MB. Never.

We still have the "no more than 40 links total" limit, so it would obviously
be limited by that...