From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: set FS_SUPPORTS_SEEK_HOLE flag. Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 01:43:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20150421084312.GA1088@infradead.org> References: <20150420193347.29378d69@notabene.brown> <20150420052752.26554.13596.stgit@notabene.brown> <20150420052558.26554.97143.stgit@notabene.brown> <30419.1429519662@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <31824.1429523209@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20150420094855.GA21116@infradead.org> <20150420125835.GJ889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , David Howells , NeilBrown , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:40155 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751473AbbDUInU (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2015 04:43:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150420125835.GJ889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 01:58:35PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > Do ext4 and xfs support this, do you know? > > > > Yes. As do f2fs, ocfs2, gfs2, ceph and NFSv4.2 > > Er... Nominally, gfs2 supports it. By treating all files as "there's a > hole starting at EOF". Same as ext2 or even minix... Yeah remove gfs2 from the list.