From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: remove unused BIO_RW_BLOCK and BIO_EOF flags
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:53:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20150424195316.GA20013@lst.de>
References: <1429904462-16998-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1429904462-16998-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <x49vbglxq92.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55313 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S933695AbbDXTxT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:53:19 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <x49vbglxq92.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:47:37PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Any particular reason you elected to leave a hole in the numbering?  I
> don't have a preference either way, but I don't think there's any harm
> in compressing it.

This was the simplest way to do it and I'm a lazy bastard.