From: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/file.c: don't acquire files->file_lock in fd_install()
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:05:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150427190515.GC2588@mguzik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429678768.18561.64.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:59:28PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> Mateusz Guzik reported :
>
> Currently obtaining a new file descriptor results in locking fdtable
> twice - once in order to reserve a slot and second time to fill it.
>
> Holding the spinlock in __fd_install() is needed in case a resize is
> done, or to prevent a resize.
>
> Mateusz provided an RFC patch and a micro benchmark :
> http://people.redhat.com/~mguzik/pipebench.c
>
> A resize is an unlikely operation in a process lifetime,
> as table size is at least doubled at every resize.
>
> We can use RCU instead of the spinlock :
>
> __fd_install() must wait if a resize is in progress.
>
> The resize must block new __fd_install() callers from starting,
> and wait that ongoing install are finished (synchronize_sched())
>
> resize should be attempted by a single thread to not waste resources.
>
> rcu_sched variant is used, as __fd_install() and expand_fdtable() run
> from process context.
>
> It gives us a ~30% speedup using pipebench with 16 threads, and a ~10%
> speedup with another program using TCP sockets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Reported-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
Thanks,
> ---
> fs/file.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/linux/fdtable.h | 3 +
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> index 93c5f89c248b..17cef5e52f16 100644
> --- a/fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/file.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,13 @@ static int expand_fdtable(struct files_struct *files, int nr)
>
> spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> new_fdt = alloc_fdtable(nr);
> +
> + /* make sure all __fd_install() have seen resize_in_progress
> + * or have finished their rcu_read_lock_sched() section.
> + */
> + if (atomic_read(&files->count) > 1)
> + synchronize_sched();
> +
> spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> if (!new_fdt)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -158,21 +165,14 @@ static int expand_fdtable(struct files_struct *files, int nr)
> __free_fdtable(new_fdt);
> return -EMFILE;
> }
> - /*
> - * Check again since another task may have expanded the fd table while
> - * we dropped the lock
> - */
> cur_fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> - if (nr >= cur_fdt->max_fds) {
> - /* Continue as planned */
> - copy_fdtable(new_fdt, cur_fdt);
> - rcu_assign_pointer(files->fdt, new_fdt);
> - if (cur_fdt != &files->fdtab)
> - call_rcu(&cur_fdt->rcu, free_fdtable_rcu);
> - } else {
> - /* Somebody else expanded, so undo our attempt */
> - __free_fdtable(new_fdt);
> - }
> + BUG_ON(nr < cur_fdt->max_fds);
> + copy_fdtable(new_fdt, cur_fdt);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(files->fdt, new_fdt);
> + if (cur_fdt != &files->fdtab)
> + call_rcu(&cur_fdt->rcu, free_fdtable_rcu);
> + /* coupled with smp_rmb() in __fd_install() */
> + smp_wmb();
> return 1;
> }
>
> @@ -185,21 +185,38 @@ static int expand_fdtable(struct files_struct *files, int nr)
> * The files->file_lock should be held on entry, and will be held on exit.
> */
> static int expand_files(struct files_struct *files, int nr)
> + __releases(files->file_lock)
> + __acquires(files->file_lock)
> {
> struct fdtable *fdt;
> + int expanded = 0;
>
> +repeat:
> fdt = files_fdtable(files);
>
> /* Do we need to expand? */
> if (nr < fdt->max_fds)
> - return 0;
> + return expanded;
>
> /* Can we expand? */
> if (nr >= sysctl_nr_open)
> return -EMFILE;
>
> + if (unlikely(files->resize_in_progress)) {
> + spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> + expanded = 1;
> + wait_event(files->resize_wait, !files->resize_in_progress);
> + spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> + goto repeat;
> + }
> +
> /* All good, so we try */
> - return expand_fdtable(files, nr);
> + files->resize_in_progress = true;
> + expanded = expand_fdtable(files, nr);
> + files->resize_in_progress = false;
> +
> + wake_up_all(&files->resize_wait);
> + return expanded;
> }
>
> static inline void __set_close_on_exec(int fd, struct fdtable *fdt)
> @@ -256,6 +273,8 @@ struct files_struct *dup_fd(struct files_struct *oldf, int *errorp)
> atomic_set(&newf->count, 1);
>
> spin_lock_init(&newf->file_lock);
> + newf->resize_in_progress = false;
> + init_waitqueue_head(&newf->resize_wait);
> newf->next_fd = 0;
> new_fdt = &newf->fdtab;
> new_fdt->max_fds = NR_OPEN_DEFAULT;
> @@ -553,11 +572,20 @@ void __fd_install(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd,
> struct file *file)
> {
> struct fdtable *fdt;
> - spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
> - fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> +
> + rcu_read_lock_sched();
> +
> + while (unlikely(files->resize_in_progress)) {
> + rcu_read_unlock_sched();
> + wait_event(files->resize_wait, !files->resize_in_progress);
> + rcu_read_lock_sched();
> + }
> + /* coupled with smp_wmb() in expand_fdtable() */
> + smp_rmb();
> + fdt = READ_ONCE(files->fdt);
> BUG_ON(fdt->fd[fd] != NULL);
> rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], file);
> - spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> + rcu_read_unlock_sched();
> }
>
> void fd_install(unsigned int fd, struct file *file)
> diff --git a/include/linux/fdtable.h b/include/linux/fdtable.h
> index 230f87bdf5ad..fbb88740634a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fdtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fdtable.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct files_struct {
> * read mostly part
> */
> atomic_t count;
> + bool resize_in_progress;
> + wait_queue_head_t resize_wait;
> +
> struct fdtable __rcu *fdt;
> struct fdtable fdtab;
> /*
>
>
--
Mateusz Guzik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-27 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-16 12:16 [RFC PATCH] fs: use a sequence counter instead of file_lock in fd_install Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-16 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 18:09 ` Al Viro
2015-04-16 20:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 20:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 22:00 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-16 22:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-16 22:35 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-17 21:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-17 22:16 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-17 23:02 ` Al Viro
2015-04-18 19:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-20 13:41 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-20 16:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-20 16:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-20 13:06 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-20 13:43 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-20 15:10 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-20 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-20 20:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-21 18:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-21 20:06 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-21 20:12 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-21 21:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-22 4:59 ` [PATCH] fs/file.c: don't acquire files->file_lock in fd_install() Eric Dumazet
2015-04-27 19:05 ` Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2015-04-28 16:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-29 4:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2015-06-22 2:32 ` Al Viro
2015-06-23 5:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-06-30 13:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Eric Dumazet
2015-04-22 13:31 ` [RFC PATCH] fs: use a sequence counter instead of file_lock in fd_install Mateusz Guzik
2015-04-22 13:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-04-21 20:57 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150427190515.GC2588@mguzik \
--to=mguzik@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ydroneaud@opteya.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).