From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Add back check for !inode in walk_component()
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 18:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507172834.GD889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150507125241.4da739ac@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:52:41PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Commit 698934df8b45 "VFS: Combine inode checks with d_is_negative() and
> d_is_positive() in pathwalk" removed a check for inode being NULL in
> walk_component() where the type is tested. Stressing my tracefs create
> and remove instances while reading the files now triggers this:
So you get NULL ->d_inode with stale flags? The thing is, ->d_inode
becoming NULL should happen via d_delete(), which goes throug this:
unsigned flags = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_flags);
flags &= ~(DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE | DCACHE_FALLTHRU);
WRITE_ONCE(dentry->d_flags, flags);
smp_wmb();
dentry->d_inode = NULL;
and after that assignment to ->d_flags you'll see d_is_negative() being
true. OTOH, we have
*inode = dentry->d_inode;
if (read_seqcount_retry(&dentry->d_seq, seq))
in lookup_fast(), and read_seqcount_retry() is
{
smp_rmb();
return __read_seqcount_retry(s, start);
}
IOW, we have smp_rmb() between fetching ->d_inode and checking ->d_flags.
If you can reproduce that at will, could you make it dump nd->flags along with
dentry involved?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 16:52 [PATCH] VFS: Add back check for !inode in walk_component() Steven Rostedt
2015-05-07 17:28 ` Al Viro [this message]
2015-05-07 17:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-07 17:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-07 18:13 ` Al Viro
2015-05-07 18:43 ` Al Viro
2015-05-07 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-07 21:47 ` Al Viro
2015-05-07 22:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-08 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-07 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150507172834.GD889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).