From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] fs, proc: don't guard /proc//task//children on CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 01:05:06 +0300 Message-ID: <20150521220506.GA16716@uranus> References: <1432204221-1933-1-git-send-email-alban@endocode.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alban Crequy , Oleg Nesterov , Kees Cook , Pavel Emelyanov , Serge Hallyn , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Linux API , Alexander Viro , Linux FS Devel , Andrew Morton , Alban Crequy , Iago Lopez Galeiras To: Andy Lutomirski Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 02:47:33PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > Since the children proc file is useful outside of checkpoint-restore, > > I am removing the guard on CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE. > > I sent an essentially identical patch a couple years ago, and it got > some interesting comments: > Oh, it is 2k13, I thought it's merged already ;) > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/0e00e9073855c02a382d49ba1ede9c4fda3451b7.1372189875.git.luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org > > See also: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/5f9a6b3ab75b12f2c5ba61ea1f6f3b08e9952b55.1372280661.git.luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org