From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Security: Provide unioned file support Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 08:59:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20150619075903.GI17109@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20150618133215.12722.70352.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20150619072015.GH17109@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Howells , sds@tycho.nsa.gov, Linux-Fsdevel , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, "linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" , Kernel Mailing List To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:52:55AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Brave. > > What's going to happen to all those f_path.dentry uses where the > filesystem thinks it's getting its own dentry? > > > git grep f_path.dentry | wc -l > 171 How many of those are not for directories *and* not in something like CIFS or debugfs?