From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] libnvdimm: infrastructure for btt devices
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:20:08 +0200
Message-ID: <20150623102008.GH24894@lst.de>
References: <20150617235209.12943.24419.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150617235458.12943.23425.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150622163453.GA9187@lst.de> <CAPcyv4jAA0=aSUDazG5hS1FS0o+qg4SyMXicqF_0M0s7_cXBGw@mail.gmail.com> <20150622164837.GB9393@lst.de> <x49k2uvvbje.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> <CAPcyv4hSAPTRNLkfKGndUrxjzTp-FAW+4G8t926YZdVH2c-Q=g@mail.gmail.com> <x49bng7v9v5.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <x49bng7v9v5.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:09:02PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> The xfs example is enough to convince me that we need to support btt on
> a partition right now.  Otherwise, for RHEL at least, dax on xfs simply
> won't be supported.

Seems like an odd stance to support some new code coming out of the
blue in favor of something developed by RH for years and already shipping
as the default filesystem at the major competitor..