From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] introduce __sb_{acquire,release}_write() helpers Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:23:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20150721082335.GA6533@quack.suse.cz> References: <20150720170044.GA3868@redhat.com> <20150720170101.GA3886@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Al Viro , Dave Chinner , Dave Hansen , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Oleg Nesterov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150720170101.GA3886@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon 20-07-15 19:01:01, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Preparation to hide the sb->s_writers internals from xfs and btrfs. > Add 2 trivial define's they can use rather than play with ->s_writers > directly. No changes in btrfs/transaction.o and xfs/xfs_aops.o. > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Nice. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 8 ++------ > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 6 ++---- > include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++++ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > index 5628e25..6dca4e9 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c > @@ -1620,9 +1620,7 @@ static void do_async_commit(struct work_struct *work) > * Tell lockdep about it. > */ > if (ac->newtrans->type & __TRANS_FREEZABLE) > - rwsem_acquire_read( > - &ac->root->fs_info->sb->s_writers.lock_map[SB_FREEZE_FS-1], > - 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); > + __sb_acquire_write(ac->root->fs_info->sb, SB_FREEZE_FS); > > current->journal_info = ac->newtrans; > > @@ -1661,9 +1659,7 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction_async(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > * async commit thread will be the one to unlock it. > */ > if (ac->newtrans->type & __TRANS_FREEZABLE) > - rwsem_release( > - &root->fs_info->sb->s_writers.lock_map[SB_FREEZE_FS-1], > - 1, _THIS_IP_); > + __sb_release_write(root->fs_info->sb, SB_FREEZE_FS); > > schedule_work(&ac->work); > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > index a56960d..8034c78 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c > @@ -119,8 +119,7 @@ xfs_setfilesize_trans_alloc( > * We may pass freeze protection with a transaction. So tell lockdep > * we released it. > */ > - rwsem_release(&ioend->io_inode->i_sb->s_writers.lock_map[SB_FREEZE_FS-1], > - 1, _THIS_IP_); > + __sb_release_write(ioend->io_inode->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_FS); > /* > * We hand off the transaction to the completion thread now, so > * clear the flag here. > @@ -171,8 +170,7 @@ xfs_setfilesize_ioend( > * Similarly for freeze protection. > */ > current_set_flags_nested(&tp->t_pflags, PF_FSTRANS); > - rwsem_acquire_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_sb->s_writers.lock_map[SB_FREEZE_FS-1], > - 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); > + __sb_acquire_write(VFS_I(ip)->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_FS); > > return xfs_setfilesize(ip, tp, ioend->io_offset, ioend->io_size); > } > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h > index 35ec87e..78ac768 100644 > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > @@ -1362,6 +1362,11 @@ extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb); > void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level); > int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait); > > +#define __sb_acquire_write(sb, lev) \ > + rwsem_acquire_read(&(sb)->s_writers.lock_map[(lev)-1], 0, 1, _THIS_IP_) > +#define __sb_release_write(sb, lev) \ > + rwsem_release(&(sb)->s_writers.lock_map[(lev)-1], 1, _THIS_IP_) > + > /** > * sb_end_write - drop write access to a superblock > * @sb: the super we wrote to > -- > 1.5.5.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR