linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@cea.fr>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Aurelien CEDEYN <aurelien.cedeyn@cea.fr>
Subject: Re: Race condition introduced in 4bf46a27 VFS: Impose ordering on accesses of d_inode and d_flags
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:28:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150731122810.GA17247@u-michard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150730115045.GA24790@u-michard>

Dominique Martinet wrote on Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:50:45PM +0200:
> > My guess is that I'm just seeing a race condition that already existed
> > but the barriers make it easier to reproduce it.
> > This commit came with 2b0143b5c9 "VFS: normal filesystems (and lustre):
> > d_inode() annotations" which made 9P access d_inode through the helper,
> > which could have helped with ordering, but I'm still hitting the bug
> > "easily" with that commit.
> 
> Still looking for ideas to help diagnose further...

Slowly progressing, through carefully placed systemtap probes I got down
to this check in link_path_walk in fs/namei.c:

	        if (!d_can_lookup(nd->path.dentry)) {
			err = -ENOTDIR;
                        break;
		}

going all the way to path_init -> path_openat -> do_filp_open -> user.


Could then add a break in gdb on the err = -ENOTDIR instruction:
#0  link_path_walk (name=0xffff88042b47b027 "f", nd=0xffff88042c19eff8)
    at fs/namei.c:1845
#1  0xffffffff81209209 in path_init (dfd=<optimized out>, name=<optimized out>, 
    flags=64, nd=0x1 <irq_stack_union+1>) at fs/namei.c:1952
#2  0xffffffff8120bd42 in path_openat (dfd=<optimized out>, pathname=0xffff88042b47b000, 
    nd=0xffff88042a9cfe28, op=0xffff88042a9cff1c, flags=65) at fs/namei.c:3230
#3  0xffffffff8120d8e9 in do_filp_open (dfd=-100, pathname=0xffff88042b47b000, 
    op=0xffff88042a9cff1c) at fs/namei.c:3280
#4  0xffffffff811fb2d7 in do_sys_open (dfd=683933728, filename=<optimized out>, 
    flags=<optimized out>, mode=<optimized out>) at fs/open.c:1010
#5  0xffffffff811fb3fe in SYSC_open (mode=<optimized out>, flags=<optimized out>, 
    filename=<optimized out>) at fs/open.c:1028
#6  SyS_open (filename=<optimized out>, flags=<optimized out>, mode=<optimized out>)
    at fs/open.c:1023

Unfortunately can't seem to get much more out of it, nd->path is borked
by the time gdb gets here:
(gdb) p nd->path
$1 = {mnt = 0x6f666e69000064, dentry = 0x7379656b64616564}

Looking at other values around:
 - next->dentry seems to be the last dir (need to rename directories in
 my test to check, bad idea to name them all the same)
 - name is the name of the file that does exist

It's easy enough to reproduce for me with the script I got, so happy to
give more infos if someone has an idea...

-- 
Dominique


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-22 15:45 Race condition introduced in 4bf46a27 VFS: Impose ordering on accesses of d_inode and d_flags Dominique Martinet
2015-07-23  9:43 ` Dominique Martinet
2015-07-30 11:50 ` Dominique Martinet
2015-07-31 12:28   ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2015-07-31 15:28     ` Dominique Martinet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150731122810.GA17247@u-michard \
    --to=dominique.martinet@cea.fr \
    --cc=aurelien.cedeyn@cea.fr \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).