From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] change sb_writers to use percpu_rw_semaphore
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 21:54:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20150807195401.GA28529@redhat.com>
References: <20150722211513.GA19986@redhat.com> <20150722211541.GA20017@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150722211541.GA20017@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On 07/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> +static void sb_freeze_unlock(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> +	int level;
> +
> +	for (level = 0; level < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; ++level)
> +		percpu_up_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level);
>  }

OK, this is not exactly right, see the fix below.

Otherwise seems to work, but see another email I'll send in reply to 0/4.

Oleg.

--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ static void sb_freeze_unlock(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	int level;
 
-	for (level = 0; level < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; ++level)
+	for (level = SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; --level >= 0; )
 		percpu_up_write(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level);
 }