From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code
 [4.2-rc1 regression]
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 11:57:22 +0800
Message-ID: <20150818035722.GA17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>
References: <20150812101204.GE17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>
 <20150813004435.GN3902@dastard>
 <20150813232400.GH4496@mtj.duckdns.org>
 <20150814061939.GK17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>
 <20150817202709.GJ21075@mtj.duckdns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: axboe@fb.com, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52930 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751271AbbHRD5Z (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:57:25 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150817202709.GJ21075@mtj.duckdns.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 04:27:09PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Eryu.
> 
> lol that wasn't supposed to fix the problem you were seeing.  Can you
> please apply the following patch and see whether any warning triggers?

Sure, will do.

> Also, you aren't using lazytime, right?

Correct, I'm not using lazytime.

Thanks,
Eryu