From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression] Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:31:09 +0800 Message-ID: <20150818053109.GB17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com> References: <20150812101204.GE17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com> <20150813004435.GN3902@dastard> <20150813232400.GH4496@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150814061939.GK17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com> <20150817202709.GJ21075@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150818035722.GA17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: axboe@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Tejun Heo Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38205 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752171AbbHRFbL (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 01:31:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150818035722.GA17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:57:22AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 04:27:09PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Eryu. > > > > lol that wasn't supposed to fix the problem you were seeing. Can you > > please apply the following patch and see whether any warning triggers? > > Sure, will do. Still no warning triggered, and test passed too with this patch. Test patch applied on top of 4.2-rc6, ran generic/048 generic/049 20 times in loop. Thanks, Eryu