From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] superblock scalability patches Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 08:45:28 +1000 Message-ID: <20150821224528.GY714@dastard> References: <55D4C276.2040806@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Al Viro , linux-fsdevel , dchinner@redhat.com, kernel-team@fb.com To: Josef Bacik Return-path: Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:30292 "EHLO ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752209AbbHUWpb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:45:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55D4C276.2040806@fb.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:52:54AM -0700, Josef Bacik wrote: > Hello, > > Al would you please consider pulling from > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git > superblock-scaling > > I've rebased them onto Linus's master as of a few days ago and > retested them to make sure they were still good to go. They've all > been through a lengthy review process and thoroughly tested. The > only change since the last time I posted the patch series is I've > dropped the patch that created a new writeback list for sync to > process because of the new writeback changes. Porting that patch > over is going to take some extra work and I don't want to hold up > the rest of these patches any longer. Thanks, Been testing this for a day now, it seems to be fine. The patch that is missingis the really important scalability fix (i.e. the one that avoids the entire inode cache walk to find dirty inodes), but I can live with that being delayed to get all the prep merged sooner. Tested-by: Dave Chinner Thanks, Josef! Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com