From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, axboe@fb.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:34:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824083437.GP17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150824062425.GU3902@dastard>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:24:25PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:18:16AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:11:23AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >
> > > Eryu, can you change the way you run the event trace to be:
> > >
> > > $ sudo trace-cmd <options> -o <outfile location> ./check <test options>
> > >
> > > rather than running the trace as a background operation elsewhere?
> > > Maybe that will give better results.
[snip]
> Anyway, Eryum long and short of it is that you don't need to worry
> about testing all the different combinations - we now know that the
> completion events are occurring, so let's focus on whether the sync
> code is not waiting for them correctly. Can you trace the following
> events:
>
> xfs_log_force
> xfs_setfilesize
> writeback_queue
> writeback_exec
> writeback_start
> writeback_queue_io
> writeback_written
> writeback_pages_written
>
> basically I'm trying to see if we've got all the BDI events as we'd
> expect then to be queued and run for sync, and when the ->sync_fs
> call occurs during the sync process before shutdown and unmount...
I collected two versions of trace info with crc enabled.
http://128.199.137.77/writeback-crc/
This version traced the same events as previous runs.
http://128.199.137.77/writeback-crc-v2/
And this version only traced the events you listed above.
And the results of other tests to check(all done with v4 xfs, with no
tracepoints enabled):
> Other things to check (separately):
> - change godown to godown -f
Passed 100 loops.
> - add a "sleep 5" before running godown after sync
Failed, if you need the trace info please let me know.
> - add a "sleep 5; sync" before running godown
Passed 100 loops.
Thanks,
Eryu
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150812101204.GE17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>
2015-08-13 0:44 ` generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression] Dave Chinner
2015-08-13 15:34 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 19:16 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 22:44 ` [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes Tejun Heo
2015-08-14 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-14 15:14 ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-17 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 5:33 ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-17 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 9:16 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-18 17:47 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 19:54 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-20 6:12 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:01 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:36 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:37 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 16:55 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-20 23:04 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 18:10 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 22:53 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-21 10:20 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-22 0:30 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-22 4:46 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24 1:11 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 3:18 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24 6:24 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 8:34 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2015-08-24 8:55 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 9:19 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 19:08 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 19:32 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 21:09 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 21:45 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:54 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-25 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 block/for-linus] writeback: sync_inodes_sb() must write out I_DIRTY_TIME inodes and always call wait_sb_inodes() Tejun Heo
2015-08-25 20:37 ` Jens Axboe
2015-08-26 9:00 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 23:24 ` generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression] Tejun Heo
2015-08-14 6:19 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-17 20:27 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 3:57 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-18 5:31 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150824083437.GP17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).