linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, axboe@fb.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:55:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824085549.GB714@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150824083437.GP17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:34:37PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 04:24:25PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:18:16AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:11:23AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Eryu, can you change the way you run the event trace to be:
> > > > 
> > > > $ sudo trace-cmd <options> -o <outfile location> ./check <test options>
> > > > 
> > > > rather than running the trace as a background operation elsewhere?
> > > > Maybe that will give better results.
> [snip]
> > Anyway, Eryum long and short of it is that you don't need to worry
> > about testing all the different combinations - we now know that the
> > completion events are occurring, so let's focus on whether the sync
> > code is not waiting for them correctly. Can you trace the following
> > events:
> > 
> > 	xfs_log_force
> > 	xfs_setfilesize
> > 	writeback_queue
> > 	writeback_exec
> > 	writeback_start
> > 	writeback_queue_io
> > 	writeback_written
> > 	writeback_pages_written
> > 
> > basically I'm trying to see if we've got all the BDI events as we'd
> > expect then to be queued and run for sync, and when the ->sync_fs
> > call occurs during the sync process before shutdown and unmount...
> 
> I collected two versions of trace info with crc enabled.
> 
> http://128.199.137.77/writeback-crc/
> 
> This version traced the same events as previous runs.
> 
> http://128.199.137.77/writeback-crc-v2/
> 
> And this version only traced the events you listed above.

OK, I'll look into these later.

> And the results of other tests to check(all done with v4 xfs, with no
> tracepoints enabled):
> 
> > Other things to check (separately):
> >	- change godown to godown -f
> 
> Passed 100 loops.

Yup, I expected that from the last set of traces - the "-f" flag
triggers a log force before shutdown, and that flushes out
transactions that sync missed.

> >	- add a "sleep 5" before running godown after sync
> 
> Failed, if you need the trace info please let me know.

Expected, still nothing to flush transactions before shutdown.

> >	- add a "sleep 5; sync" before running godown
> 
> Passed 100 loops.

expected - sync flushed the transactions it missed on the first
pass.

Thanks for running these tests!

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-24  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20150812101204.GE17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>
2015-08-13  0:44 ` generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression] Dave Chinner
2015-08-13 15:34   ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 19:16     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 22:44   ` [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes Tejun Heo
2015-08-14 11:14     ` Jan Kara
2015-08-14 15:14       ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-17 20:00         ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18  5:33           ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-17 20:02       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18  9:16         ` Jan Kara
2015-08-18 17:47           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 19:54             ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 21:56               ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-20  6:12                 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:01                   ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:36                   ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:37                     ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 16:55                       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-20 23:04                         ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 18:10                           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:27                             ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 22:53                               ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-21 10:20                 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-22  0:30                   ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-22  4:46                     ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  1:11                       ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  3:18                         ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  6:24                           ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  8:34                             ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  8:55                               ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-08-24  9:19                             ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 14:51                               ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 17:11                                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 19:08                                   ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 19:32                                     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 21:09                                       ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 21:45                                         ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:54                                           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:57                                           ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-25 18:11     ` [PATCH v2 block/for-linus] writeback: sync_inodes_sb() must write out I_DIRTY_TIME inodes and always call wait_sb_inodes() Tejun Heo
2015-08-25 20:37       ` Jens Axboe
2015-08-26  9:00       ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 23:24   ` generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression] Tejun Heo
2015-08-14  6:19     ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-17 20:27       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18  3:57         ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-18  5:31           ` Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150824085549.GB714@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).