linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fs: Verify access of user towards block device file when mounting
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:55:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001155509.GD101875@ubuntu-hedt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvw2d2cn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:40:08AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> writes:
> 
> > When mounting a filesystem on a block device there is currently
> > no verification that the user has appropriate access to the
> > device file passed to mount. This has not been an issue so far
> > since the user in question has always been root, but this must
> > be changed before allowing unprivileged users to mount in user
> > namespaces.
> >
> > To fix this, add an argument to lookup_bdev() to specify the
> > required permissions. If the mask of permissions is zero, or
> > if the user has CAP_SYS_ADMIN, the permission check is skipped,
> > otherwise the lookup fails if the user does not have the
> > specified access rights for the inode at the supplied path.
> >
> > Callers associated with mounting are updated to pass permission
> > masks to lookup_bdev() so that these mounts will fail for an
> > unprivileged user who lacks permissions for the block device
> > inode. All other callers pass 0 to maintain their current
> > behaviors.
> >
> 
> Seth can you split this patch?
> 
> One patch to add an argument to lookup_bdev,
> and then for each kind of callsite a follow-on patch (if we are ready
> for that).
> 
> That will separate the logical changes and make things easier to track
> via bisect and more importantly easier to review things.

Sure, I'll do that.

Seth

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-01 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-30 20:15 [PATCH 0/5] User namespace mount updates Seth Forshee
2015-09-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Verify access of user towards block device file when mounting Seth Forshee
2015-09-30 23:42   ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-01 12:55     ` Seth Forshee
2015-10-01 13:40       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-01 14:41         ` Seth Forshee
2015-10-08 15:41           ` Seth Forshee
2015-10-01 15:55         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-10-01 23:07           ` Jan Kara
2015-10-05 14:26             ` Seth Forshee
2015-10-01 15:40   ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-10-01 15:55     ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2015-09-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: Treat foreign mounts as nosuid Seth Forshee
2015-09-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] selinux: Add support for unprivileged mounts from user namespaces Seth Forshee
2015-09-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] userns: Replace in_userns with current_in_userns Seth Forshee
2015-09-30 20:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] Smack: Handle labels consistently in untrusted mounts Seth Forshee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151001155509.GD101875@ubuntu-hedt \
    --to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).