linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Revert locking changes in DAX for v4.3
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 23:24:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151004052433.GA10753@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443830494-8748-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 06:01:32PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> This series reverts some recent changes to the locking scheme in DAX introduced
> by these two commits:
> 
> commit 843172978bb9 ("dax: fix race between simultaneous faults")
> commit 46c043ede471 ("mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX")
> 
> Changes from v1:
>  -  Squashed patches 1 and 2 from the first series into a single patch to avoid
>     adding another spot in the git history where we could end up referencing an
>     uninitialized pointer.
> 
> Ross Zwisler (2):
>   Revert "mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX"
>   Revert "dax: fix race between simultaneous faults"
> 
>  fs/dax.c    | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------
>  mm/memory.c |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.1.0

*sigh* - even after these reverts we can deadlock on in the DAX PMD code with
its original locking scheme.  I can hit them 100% of the time with either
generic/074 or generic/198 using either XFS or ext4.  I'll debug exactly
what's going on on Monday.

The quick and easy workaround for this is to do a "return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;"
at the beginning of __dax_pmd_fault() to just turn off PMD faults while we
rework the locking for v4.4.  This saves us reverting and re-adding all the
PMD code, and will let us ship v4.3 without known deadlocks.

Other better ideas?

- Ross

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-04  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-03  0:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] Revert locking changes in DAX for v4.3 Ross Zwisler
2015-10-03  0:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "mm: take i_mmap_lock in unmap_mapping_range() for DAX" Ross Zwisler
2015-10-03  0:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Revert "dax: fix race between simultaneous faults" Ross Zwisler
2015-10-04  5:24 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151004052433.GA10753@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).