From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Kornievskaia, Olga" <Olga.Kornievskaia@netapp.com>,
Leonid Fedorenchik <leonid.fedorenchik@paragon-software.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: help with understanding evict inode functionality
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 23:01:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151004060136.GA19017@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151004022802.GB4442@thunk.org>
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:28:02PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> evict_inode() is what happens when i_nlink *and* i_icount hits zero.
> So it is only then that the local disk file system can actually
> release the inode and blocks associated with that inode.
That's not true. Evict is called when we want to remove an inode
from memory. i_count needs to be zero for that, but i_nlink doesn't
as we don't cache inodes forever. When we drop i_count and it reaches
zero iput_final() is called, which decides depending on ->drop_inode
to either evict the inode or keep it on the LRU.
> Hence, there is no point trying to worry about what hapens if the file
> is reopened again, since the original inode is *gone*. You could
> create a new file with the same file name, but none of the resources
> associated with the old inode need to be preserved for the newly
> created file.
And this isn't quite true either - this particular struct inode instance
might not come back, but we need to synchronize against a racing iget
if i_nlink wasn't zero. This is done with the I_FREEING bit and the
bit wake up on __I_NEW.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-04 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 13:57 help with understanding evict inode functionality Leonid Fedorenchik
2015-10-02 14:38 ` Kornievskaia, Olga
2015-10-04 2:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-04 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-10-04 22:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-15 9:53 ` Jan Kara
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-01 22:54 Kornievskaia, Olga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151004060136.GA19017@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Olga.Kornievskaia@netapp.com \
--cc=leonid.fedorenchik@paragon-software.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).