From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Make sync_file_range(2) use WB_SYNC_NONE writeback
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:30:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151028093040.GG29811@alap3.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445714897-26342-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.com>
Hi Jan,
Thanks for looking into this and promptly sending a patch.
On 2015-10-24 21:28:17 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> These days do_sync_mapping_range() went away and we can switch
> sync_file_range(2) back to issuing WB_SYNC_NONE writeback. That should
> help PostgreSQL avoid large latency spikes when flushing data in the
> background.
>
> diff --git a/fs/sync.c b/fs/sync.c
> index fbc98ee62044..ef60e812d771 100644
> --- a/fs/sync.c
> +++ b/fs/sync.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sync_file_range, int, fd, loff_t, offset, loff_t, nbytes,
> }
>
> if (flags & SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE) {
> - ret = filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, offset, endbyte);
> + ret = __filemap_fdatawrite_range(mapping, offset, endbyte,
> + WB_SYNC_NONE);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_put;
> }
Thanks. Would scheduling a comparative benchmark of this be helpful
pushing htis forward ? Would probably only be early next week, I'm at
the european postgresql conference right now.
Regards,
Andres
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-24 19:28 [PATCH] fs: Make sync_file_range(2) use WB_SYNC_NONE writeback Jan Kara
2015-10-28 9:30 ` Andres Freund [this message]
2015-10-28 14:18 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-06 13:06 ` Andres Freund
2015-11-06 20:43 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151028093040.GG29811@alap3.anarazel.de \
--to=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).