linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: "Seymour, Shane M" <shane.seymour@hpe.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:14:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151111061435.GA32272@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DDB9C85B850785449757F9914A034FCB444D1676@G9W0766.americas.hpqcorp.net>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:30:07AM +0000, Seymour, Shane M wrote:
> A quick question about this part of the patch:
> 
> > +	uint64_t end = start + len - 1;
> 
> > +	if (end >= i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> > +	/* Invalidate the page cache, including dirty pages */
> > +	mapping = bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
> > +	truncate_inode_pages_range(mapping, start, end);
> 
> blk_ioctl_zeroout accepts unsigned values for start and end (uint64_t) but
> loff_t types are turned from i_size_read() and passed as the 2nd and 3rd
> values to truncate_inode_pages_range() and loff_t is a signed value. It
> should be possible to pass in some values would overflow the calculation of
> end causing the test on the value of end and the result of i_size_read to
> pass but then end up passing a large unsigned value for in start that would
> be implicitly converted to signed in truncate_inode_pages_range. I was
> wondering if you'd tested passing in data that would cause sign conversion
> issues when passed into truncate_inode_pages_range (does it handle it
> gracefully?) or should this code:
> 
> 	if (start & 511)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	if (len & 511)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> be something more like this (for better sanity checking of your arguments)
> which will ensure that you don't have implicit conversion issues from
> unsigned to signed and ensure that the result of adding them together won't
> either:
> 
> 	if ((start & 511) || (start > (uint64_t)LLONG_MAX))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	if ((len & 511) ) || (len > (uint64_t)LLONG_MAX))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 	if (end > (uint64_t)LLONG_MAX)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> My apologies in advance if I've made a mistake when looking at this and my
> concerns about unsigned values being implicitly converted to signed are
> unfounded (I would have hoped for compiler warnings about any implicit
> conversions though).

I don't have a device large enough to test for signedness errors, since passing
huge values for start and len never make it past the i_size_read check.
However, I do see that I forgot to check the padding values, so I'll update
that.

--D
> 
> Thanks
> Shane

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-11  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-10  5:15 [PATCH] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Darrick J. Wong
2015-11-11  5:30 ` Seymour, Shane M
2015-11-11  6:14   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2015-11-11 23:30     ` Seymour, Shane M
2015-11-12  0:56       ` Seymour, Shane M
2015-11-13  3:36     ` Seymour, Shane M
2015-11-13 15:47     ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-13 21:36       ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-21  1:06 [PATCH] block: Add discard flag to blkdev_issue_zeroout() function Martin K. Petersen
2015-01-21 10:10 ` [PATCH] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Darrick J. Wong
2014-11-07  5:08 [RFC] Discard update for 3.19 Martin K. Petersen
2014-11-07  5:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function Martin K. Petersen
2014-11-11  0:04   ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-11-17 19:28     ` [PATCH] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151111061435.GA32272@birch.djwong.org \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=shane.seymour@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).