From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-afs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:21:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124202113.GJ26718@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151120145457.18930.79678.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:54:57PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> The defined bits in st_ioc_flags are the usual FS_xxx_FL, plus some extra
> flags that might be supplied by the filesystem. Note that Ext4 returns
> flags outside of {EXT4,FS}_FL_USER_VISIBLE in response to FS_IOC_GETFLAGS.
> Should {EXT4,FS}_FL_USER_VISIBLE be extended to cover them? Or should the
> extra flags be suppressed?
Quite frankly, we should not expose flags owned by a filesystem like
this. Create a new set of flagsi that are exposed by the syscall,
and every filesystem is responsible for translating their internal
flag values to the syscall flag values....
> The defined bits in the st_information field give local system data on a
> file, how it is accessed, where it is and what it does:
>
> STATX_INFO_ENCRYPTED File is encrypted
> STATX_INFO_TEMPORARY File is temporary (NTFS/CIFS/deleted)
> STATX_INFO_FABRICATED File was made up by filesystem
> STATX_INFO_KERNEL_API File is kernel API (eg: procfs/sysfs)
> STATX_INFO_REMOTE File is remote
> STATX_INFO_OFFLINE File is offline (CIFS)
> STATX_INFO_AUTOMOUNT Dir is automount trigger
> STATX_INFO_AUTODIR Dir provides unlisted automounts
> STATX_INFO_NONSYSTEM_OWNERSHIP File has non-system ownership details
> STATX_INFO_REPARSE_POINT File is reparse point (NTFS/CIFS)
STATX_INFO_XATTR File/dir has extended attrs
... just like these STATX_INFO flags are filesystem independent...
And, FWIW, I'd like to see more than one local filesystem supported
in the initial patchset (e.g. btrfs) and also have all their
inode/fs flags exposed so we don't end up encoding weird
ext4-specific feature quirks into the API.....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 14:54 [RFC][PATCH 00/12] Enhanced file stat system call David Howells
2015-11-20 14:54 ` [PATCH 01/12] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding David Howells
2015-11-24 17:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2015-11-24 19:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-24 20:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-29 2:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-29 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-30 14:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-30 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-30 14:46 ` Elmar Stellnberger
2015-11-26 15:28 ` David Howells
2015-11-20 14:54 ` [PATCH 02/12] statx: Provide IOC flags for Windows fs attributes David Howells
2015-11-24 19:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-26 15:35 ` David Howells
2015-11-26 22:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2015-11-26 16:01 ` David Howells
2015-11-20 14:54 ` [PATCH 03/12] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available David Howells
2015-11-24 20:21 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-12-04 12:06 ` Pavel Machek
2015-12-21 23:21 ` David Howells
2015-11-20 14:55 ` [PATCH 04/12] statx: AFS: Return enhanced file attributes David Howells
2015-11-20 14:55 ` [PATCH 05/12] statx: Ext4: " David Howells
2015-11-20 14:55 ` [PATCH 06/12] statx: NFS: " David Howells
2015-11-20 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/12] statx: CIFS: Return enhanced attributes David Howells
2015-11-24 17:33 ` Steve French
2015-11-24 17:34 ` Steve French
2015-11-20 14:56 ` [PATCH 08/12] fsinfo: Add a system call to make enhanced filesystem info available David Howells
2015-11-20 14:56 ` [PATCH 09/12] fsinfo: Ext4: Return information through the filesystem info syscall David Howells
2015-11-20 14:56 ` [PATCH 10/12] fsinfo: AFS: " David Howells
2015-11-20 14:56 ` [PATCH 11/12] fsinfo: NFS: " David Howells
2015-11-20 14:56 ` [PATCH 12/12] fsinfo: CIFS: " David Howells
2015-11-20 16:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/12] Enhanced file stat system call Martin Steigerwald
2015-11-24 8:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-24 8:48 ` Martin Steigerwald
2015-11-24 8:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-20 16:28 ` David Howells
2015-11-20 16:35 ` Martin Steigerwald
2015-11-25 17:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-11-25 19:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2015-11-20 16:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-11-24 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-24 14:43 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-11-24 16:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2015-11-24 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-26 15:19 ` David Howells
2015-11-26 22:06 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151124202113.GJ26718@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-afs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).