From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:41798 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S933315AbbLHQQt (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:16:49 -0500
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:16:46 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: tao.peng@primarydata.com, jeff.layton@primarydata.com,
	bfields@fieldses.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] locks: new locks_mandatory_area calling convention
Message-ID: <20151208161646.GO20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <1449143992-7415-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
 <1449143992-7415-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
 <20151208040504.GA2791@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20151208145453.GA3621@lst.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151208145453.GA3621@lst.de>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:54:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:05:04AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > Where the hell would truncate(2) get struct file, anyway?  IOW, the inode
> > argument is _not_ pointless; re-added.
> 
> Oh, right.  Interestingly is seems like xfstests has no coverage of this
> code path at all.

LTP does (ftruncate04)...