From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, XFS Developers <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] dax: fix NULL pointer dereference in __dax_dbg()
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:16:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160107221606.GB20802@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4i_xfihzc_LKYiz_XuTVVCMSf5dsJQE8g7-NURe170p7g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:17:22AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > On Wed 06-01-16 11:14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ross Zwisler
> >> <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > __dax_dbg() currently assumes that bh->b_bdev is non-NULL, passing it into
> >> > bdevname() where is is dereferenced. This assumption isn't always true -
> >> > when called for reads of holes, ext4_dax_mmap_get_block() returns a buffer
> >> > head where bh->b_bdev is never set. I hit this BUG while testing the DAX
> >> > PMD fault path.
> >> >
> >> > Instead, verify that we have a valid bh->b_bdev, else just say "unknown"
> >> > for the block device.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > fs/dax.c | 7 ++++++-
> >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> >> > index 7af8797..03cc4a3 100644
> >> > --- a/fs/dax.c
> >> > +++ b/fs/dax.c
> >> > @@ -563,7 +563,12 @@ static void __dax_dbg(struct buffer_head *bh, unsigned long address,
> >> > {
> >> > if (bh) {
> >> > char bname[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> >> > - bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> >> > +
> >> > + if (bh->b_bdev)
> >> > + bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> >> > + else
> >> > + snprintf(bname, BDEVNAME_SIZE, "unknown");
> >> > +
> >> > pr_debug("%s: %s addr: %lx dev %s state %lx start %lld "
> >> > "length %zd fallback: %s\n", fn, current->comm,
> >> > address, bname, bh->b_state, (u64)bh->b_blocknr,
> >>
> >> I'm assuming there's no danger of a such a buffer_head ever being used
> >> for the bdev parameter to dax_map_atomic()? Shouldn't we also/instead
> >> go fix ext4 to not send partially filled buffer_heads?
> >
> > No. The real problem is a long-standing abuse of struct buffer_head to be
> > used for passing block mapping information (it's on my todo list to remove
> > that at least from DAX code and use cleaner block mapping interface but
> > first I want basic DAX functionality to settle down to avoid unnecessary
> > conflicts). Filesystem is not supposed to touch bh->b_bdev. If you need
> > that filled in, set it yourself in before passing bh to the block mapping
> > function.
> >
>
> Ok, makes sense.
>
> Ross, can you fix this instead by unconditionally looking up the bdev
> rather that saying "unknown". The bdev should always be retrievable.
Sure, will do.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 18:00 [PATCH v7 0/9] DAX fsync/msync support Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:00 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] dax: fix NULL pointer dereference in __dax_dbg() Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 19:14 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-07 9:34 ` Jan Kara
2016-01-07 15:17 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-07 22:16 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2016-01-07 23:10 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-07 23:39 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:00 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] dax: fix conversion of holes to PMDs Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 19:04 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-07 22:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-08 4:18 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-07 13:22 ` Jan Kara
2016-01-07 22:11 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-11 12:23 ` Jan Kara
2016-01-06 18:00 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] pmem: add wb_cache_pmem() to the PMEM API Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:00 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:00 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] mm: add find_get_entries_tag() Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] dax: add support for fsync/msync Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] ext2: call dax_pfn_mkwrite() for DAX fsync/msync Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] ext4: " Ross Zwisler
2016-01-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] xfs: " Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160107221606.GB20802@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).