From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@hpe.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: xfs over pmem - cp performance
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:03:28 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160108220328.GB10456@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B40295BF0881D@G4W3202.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 09:07:27PM +0000, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) wrote:
> I tried using cp to copy the linux git tree between
> pmem devices like this:
> cp -r /mnt/xfs-pmem1/linux /mnt/xfs-pmem2
>
> The time taken by various filesystems varies (4.4-rc5):
> * xfs w/dax: 42 s
> * xfs no dax: 14 s
> * ext4 w/dax: 7 s
> * ext4 no dax: 15 s
> * btrfs no dax: 18 s
Yes, we know.
> mount options:
> * /dev/pmem1 on /mnt/xfs-pmem1 type xfs (rw,relatime,seclabel,attr2,dax,inode64,noquota)
> * /dev/pmem1 on /mnt/ext4-pmem1 type ext4 (rw,relatime,seclabel,dax,data=ordered)
> * /dev/pmem1 on /mnt/btrfs-pmem1 type btrfs (rw,relatime,seclabel,ssd,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
>
> xfs with dax spends most of the time in clear_page_c_e and
> dax-clear_blocks (from "perf top"):
> 30.06% [kernel] [k] clear_page_c_e
> 12.24% [kernel] [k] dax_clear_blocks
That's where the difference is - XFS is zeroing the blocks during
allocation so that we know that a failed write or crash during a
write will not expose stale data to the user. I've made comment
about this previously here:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-11/msg00021.html
and it's a result of the current "everything is synchronous" DAX cpu
cache control behaviour.
I think it's worth noting that ext4 is not spending any time
zeroing the blocks during allocation, which I think means that it
can expose stale data as a result of a crash or partial write....
We're working on fixing this, but it needs all the fsync patches
from Ross to enable us to turn off the synchronous cache flushes
in the DAX IO code.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-08 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-08 21:07 xfs over pmem - cp performance Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2016-01-08 22:03 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-01-12 17:31 ` Ross Zwisler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160108220328.GB10456@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox