From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:51:05 +0000 From: Al Viro To: chengang@emindsoft.com.cn Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Chen Gang Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: dcache: Use bool return value instead of int Message-ID: <20160111225104.GO17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1452547845-12039-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452547845-12039-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:30:45AM +0800, chengang@emindsoft.com.cn wrote: > From: Chen Gang > > Use bool type for all functions which return boolean value. It will not > only let code clearer, but also sometimes let gcc produce better code. What's the point of this chunk? > static enum d_walk_ret check_mount(void *data, struct dentry *dentry) > { > - int *ret = data; > + bool *ret = data; > if (d_mountpoint(dentry)) { > - *ret = 1; > + *ret = true; > return D_WALK_QUIT; > } > return D_WALK_CONTINUE; You are replacing a 1-word store with 1-byte store; if anything, that's more likely to yield _worse_ code, not better one. > -static inline int d_unhashed(const struct dentry *dentry) > +static inline bool d_unhashed(const struct dentry *dentry) > { > return hlist_bl_unhashed(&dentry->d_hash); > } > > -static inline int d_unlinked(const struct dentry *dentry) > +static inline bool d_unlinked(const struct dentry *dentry) > { > return d_unhashed(dentry) && !IS_ROOT(dentry); > } > -static inline int simple_positive(struct dentry *dentry) > +static inline bool simple_positive(struct dentry *dentry) > { > return d_really_is_positive(dentry) && !d_unhashed(dentry); > } And these three are harmless, but completely pointless...