From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Linux RDMA Mailing List <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] Remote access to pmem on storage targets
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:04:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160127000404.GN6033@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F0E2108B-891C-4570-B486-7DC7C4FB59C4@oracle.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:58:44AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> It is not going to be like the well-worn paradigm that
> involves a page cache on the storage target backed by
> slow I/O operations. The protocol layers on storage
> targets need a way to discover memory addresses of
> persistent memory that will be used as source/sink
> buffers for RDMA operations.
>
> And making data durable after a write is going to need
> some thought. So I believe some new plumbing will be
> necessary.
Haven't we already solve this for the pNFS file driver that XFS
implements? i.e. these export operations:
int (*get_uuid)(struct super_block *sb, u8 *buf, u32 *len, u64 *offset);
int (*map_blocks)(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
u64 len, struct iomap *iomap,
bool write, u32 *device_generation);
int (*commit_blocks)(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomaps,
int nr_iomaps, struct iattr *iattr);
so mapping/allocation of file offset to sector mappings, which can
then trivially be used to grab the memory address through the bdev
->direct_access method, yes?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 21:19 [LSF/MM TOPIC] Remote access to pmem on storage targets Chuck Lever
2016-01-26 8:25 ` [Lsf-pc] " Jan Kara
2016-01-26 15:58 ` Chuck Lever
2016-01-27 0:04 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-01-27 15:55 ` Chuck Lever
2016-01-28 21:10 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-27 10:52 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-26 15:25 ` Atchley, Scott
2016-01-26 15:29 ` Chuck Lever
2016-01-26 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-27 16:54 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC/ATTEND] RDMA passive target Boaz Harrosh
2016-01-27 17:02 ` [Lsf-pc] " James Bottomley
2016-01-27 17:27 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-01-31 14:20 ` Boaz Harrosh
2016-01-31 16:55 ` Yigal Korman
2016-02-01 10:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160127000404.GN6033@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).