From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:60434 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751245AbcBHJWD (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 04:22:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:22:00 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: don't use ioends for direct write completions Message-ID: <20160208092200.GA31881@lst.de> References: <1454524816-11392-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1454524816-11392-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160208010026.GL31407@dastard> <20160208061731.GC27429@dastard> <20160208073121.GA30092@lst.de> <20160208091644.GD27429@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160208091644.GD27429@dastard> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:16:44PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I can't tell if you are saying what I've done is fine if the > xfs-dio-fix-4.6 branch is stable (so others can pull it) or whether > it should be in some other tree. Can you clarify, Christoph? What you are doing is fine, thanks!