From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:57:38 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make sure struct filename->iname is word-aligned
Message-ID: <20160216225738.GD17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <1455662966-7977-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1455662966-7977-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:49:24PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> I noticed that offsetof(struct filename, iname) is actually 28 on 64
> bit platforms, so we always pass an unaligned pointer to
> strncpy_from_user. This is mostly a problem for those 64 bit platforms
> without HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, but even on x86_64, unaligned
> accesses carry a penalty, especially when done in a loop.
> 
> Let's try to ensure we always pass an aligned destination pointer to
> strncpy_from_user. I considered making refcnt a long instead of doing
> the union thing, and mostly ended up tossing a coin.

Why not swap it with the previous field, then?