From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Subject: Re: races in ll_splice_alias() and elsewhere (ext4, ocfs2)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 02:59:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310025948.GG17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160310022041.GF17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:20:42AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Umm... AFAICS, ext4_d_revalidate() is racy, starting with the very
> first line. What's to prevent it being moved while we are calling that?
> Lose timeslice on preemption, have mv(1) move it elsewhere, followed by
> rmdir taking the now-empty parent out. Come back and dir points to
> freed memory, with ci being complete junk. Looks like oopsen galore...
> Ted, am I missing something subtle here?
BTW, the fact that original parent dentry is pinned by caller doesn't help
at all - by the time we get to ext4_d_revalidate() its ->d_parent might have
been pointing to something we are *not* pinning, with another rename() +
rmdir() completing the problem. It's going to be hard to hit, but not
impossible. Have d_move() happen right after we'd found the match in
__d_lookup(), then get preempted just as we'd fetched (already changed)
->d_parent->d_inode in ext4_d_revalidate(). The second rename() + rmdir()
have to complete by the time we regain CPU and we are screwed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 16:05 races in ll_splice_alias() Al Viro
2016-03-08 20:44 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-08 21:11 ` Al Viro
2016-03-08 23:18 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-09 0:34 ` Al Viro
2016-03-09 0:53 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-09 1:26 ` Al Viro
2016-03-09 5:20 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-09 23:47 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 2:20 ` races in ll_splice_alias() and elsewhere (ext4, ocfs2) Al Viro
2016-03-10 2:59 ` Al Viro [this message]
2016-03-10 23:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-03-11 3:18 ` Al Viro
2016-03-11 15:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-03-10 3:08 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 3:34 ` Al Viro
2016-03-10 3:46 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 4:22 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 4:43 ` Al Viro
2016-03-10 5:15 ` Al Viro
2016-03-11 3:47 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 5:47 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 19:59 ` Al Viro
2016-03-10 20:34 ` do we need that smp_wmb() in __d_alloc()? Al Viro
2016-03-10 21:17 ` Al Viro
2016-03-10 21:22 ` races in ll_splice_alias() and elsewhere (ext4, ocfs2) Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-10 23:23 ` Al Viro
2016-03-11 3:25 ` Drokin, Oleg
2016-03-12 17:22 ` Al Viro
2016-03-13 14:35 ` Sage Weil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160310025948.GG17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).