linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: "Ignacy Gawędzki" <ignacy.gawedzki@green-communications.fr>,
	"Vivek Goyal" <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] OverlayFS: Fix checking permissions during lookup.
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:23:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160317152301.GQ8655@tucsk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160229165440.GA28299@zenon.in.qult.net>

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 05:54:40PM +0100, Ignacy Gawędzki wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:25:46AM -0500, thus spake Vivek Goyal:
> > I agree that semantics should be more consistent. I don't know that
> > if upper layer should override lower layer checks or not.
> > 
> > One could also argue that if root did chown, then changes effectively
> > happened in upper layer and anything in upper layer should become
> > visible to unpriviliged user but not the one in lower layer. 
> > 
> > I just don't know. I guess those who have more background on this
> > could pitch in and clarify that was is supposed to be the design
> > intention.

I haven't thought about this aspect yet.

[thinking]

We cannot actually respect lower layer search permissions in a merged directory,
because we cannot selectively allow or deny directory search permissions on
individual directory entries (there's simply not enough information in the
->permission() call).

The only sane thing to do is to override search permission by the upper layer
permissions.

We can do that with the cap_raise(... CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE) thing, which is what
overlayfs usually does when it needs elevated permissions to do something.

Or we can a special lookup_one_len() type helper.  But we already have the
dentry hash in the overlay dentry, so no need to recalculate that (we've also
made sure that underlying fs doesnt have ->d_hash()).  The sanity checks on
'name' are also unnecessary.  And that leaves us with __lookup_hash() where we
can just get rid of the underscores and export to modules.

Attaching folded patch.  Will post split out ones for review.

Thanks,
Miklos


diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 9c590e0f66e9..80fe2a68f361 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static int follow_dotdot(struct nameidata *nd)
  *
  * dir->d_inode->i_mutex must be held
  */
-static struct dentry *lookup_dcache(struct qstr *name, struct dentry *dir,
+static struct dentry *lookup_dcache(const struct qstr *name, struct dentry *dir,
 				    unsigned int flags, bool *need_lookup)
 {
 	struct dentry *dentry;
@@ -1506,8 +1506,8 @@ static struct dentry *lookup_real(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 	return dentry;
 }
 
-static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name,
-		struct dentry *base, unsigned int flags)
+struct dentry *lookup_hash(const struct qstr *name,
+			   struct dentry *base, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	bool need_lookup;
 	struct dentry *dentry;
@@ -1518,6 +1518,7 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name,
 
 	return lookup_real(base->d_inode, dentry, flags);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_hash);
 
 /*
  *  It's more convoluted than I'd like it to be, but... it's still fairly
@@ -1630,7 +1631,7 @@ static int lookup_slow(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path)
 	BUG_ON(nd->inode != parent->d_inode);
 
 	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
-	dentry = __lookup_hash(&nd->last, parent, nd->flags);
+	dentry = lookup_hash(&nd->last, parent, nd->flags);
 	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
 	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
 		return PTR_ERR(dentry);
@@ -2235,7 +2236,7 @@ struct dentry *kern_path_locked(const char *name, struct path *path)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
 	inode_lock_nested(path->dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
-	d = __lookup_hash(&last, path->dentry, 0);
+	d = lookup_hash(&last, path->dentry, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(d)) {
 		inode_unlock(path->dentry->d_inode);
 		path_put(path);
@@ -2319,7 +2320,7 @@ struct dentry *lookup_one_len(const char *name, struct dentry *base, int len)
 	if (err)
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 
-	return __lookup_hash(&this, base, 0);
+	return lookup_hash(&this, base, 0);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lookup_one_len);
 
@@ -2386,7 +2387,7 @@ struct dentry *lookup_one_len_unlocked(const char *name,
 		return ret;
 
 	inode_lock(base->d_inode);
-	ret =  __lookup_hash(&this, base, 0);
+	ret =  lookup_hash(&this, base, 0);
 	inode_unlock(base->d_inode);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -3498,7 +3499,7 @@ static struct dentry *filename_create(int dfd, struct filename *name,
 	 */
 	lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_EXCL;
 	inode_lock_nested(path->dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
-	dentry = __lookup_hash(&last, path->dentry, lookup_flags);
+	dentry = lookup_hash(&last, path->dentry, lookup_flags);
 	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
 		goto unlock;
 
@@ -3803,7 +3804,7 @@ retry:
 		goto exit1;
 
 	inode_lock_nested(path.dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
-	dentry = __lookup_hash(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
+	dentry = lookup_hash(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
 	error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
 	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
 		goto exit2;
@@ -3925,7 +3926,7 @@ retry:
 		goto exit1;
 retry_deleg:
 	inode_lock_nested(path.dentry->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
-	dentry = __lookup_hash(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
+	dentry = lookup_hash(&last, path.dentry, lookup_flags);
 	error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
 	if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
 		/* Why not before? Because we want correct error value */
@@ -4443,7 +4444,7 @@ retry:
 retry_deleg:
 	trap = lock_rename(new_path.dentry, old_path.dentry);
 
-	old_dentry = __lookup_hash(&old_last, old_path.dentry, lookup_flags);
+	old_dentry = lookup_hash(&old_last, old_path.dentry, lookup_flags);
 	error = PTR_ERR(old_dentry);
 	if (IS_ERR(old_dentry))
 		goto exit3;
@@ -4451,7 +4452,7 @@ retry_deleg:
 	error = -ENOENT;
 	if (d_is_negative(old_dentry))
 		goto exit4;
-	new_dentry = __lookup_hash(&new_last, new_path.dentry, lookup_flags | target_flags);
+	new_dentry = lookup_hash(&new_last, new_path.dentry, lookup_flags | target_flags);
 	error = PTR_ERR(new_dentry);
 	if (IS_ERR(new_dentry))
 		goto exit4;
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
index d894e7cd9a86..0cf45a0e904e 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
@@ -220,8 +220,7 @@ static int ovl_copy_up_locked(struct dentry *workdir, struct dentry *upperdir,
 	if (IS_ERR(newdentry))
 		goto out;
 
-	upper = lookup_one_len(dentry->d_name.name, upperdir,
-			       dentry->d_name.len);
+	upper = lookup_hash(&dentry->d_name, upperdir, 0);
 	err = PTR_ERR(upper);
 	if (IS_ERR(upper))
 		goto out1;
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
index 52f6de5d40a9..888b5fe29fdf 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
@@ -168,8 +168,7 @@ static int ovl_create_upper(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
 	int err;
 
 	inode_lock_nested(udir, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
-	newdentry = lookup_one_len(dentry->d_name.name, upperdir,
-				   dentry->d_name.len);
+	newdentry = lookup_hash(&dentry->d_name, upperdir, 0);
 	err = PTR_ERR(newdentry);
 	if (IS_ERR(newdentry))
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -337,8 +336,7 @@ static int ovl_create_over_whiteout(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
 	if (IS_ERR(newdentry))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	upper = lookup_one_len(dentry->d_name.name, upperdir,
-			       dentry->d_name.len);
+	upper = lookup_hash(&dentry->d_name, upperdir, 0);
 	err = PTR_ERR(upper);
 	if (IS_ERR(upper))
 		goto out_dput;
@@ -547,8 +545,7 @@ static int ovl_remove_and_whiteout(struct dentry *dentry, bool is_dir)
 
 	upper = ovl_dentry_upper(dentry);
 	if (!upper) {
-		upper = lookup_one_len(dentry->d_name.name, upperdir,
-				       dentry->d_name.len);
+		upper = lookup_hash(&dentry->d_name, upperdir, 0);
 		err = PTR_ERR(upper);
 		if (IS_ERR(upper))
 			goto kill_whiteout;
@@ -851,8 +848,7 @@ static int ovl_rename2(struct inode *olddir, struct dentry *old,
 		}
 	} else {
 		new_create = true;
-		newdentry = lookup_one_len(new->d_name.name, new_upperdir,
-					   new->d_name.len);
+		newdentry = lookup_hash(&new->d_name, new_upperdir, 0);
 		err = PTR_ERR(newdentry);
 		if (IS_ERR(newdentry))
 			goto out_unlock;
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index 619ad4b016d2..c16eeb3e5021 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static inline struct dentry *ovl_lookup_real(struct dentry *dir,
 	struct dentry *dentry;
 
 	inode_lock(dir->d_inode);
-	dentry = lookup_one_len(name->name, dir, name->len);
+	dentry = lookup_hash(name, dir, 0);
 	inode_unlock(dir->d_inode);
 
 	if (IS_ERR(dentry)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/namei.h b/include/linux/namei.h
index d0f25d81b46a..22cc2cece000 100644
--- a/include/linux/namei.h
+++ b/include/linux/namei.h
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ extern int kern_path_mountpoint(int, const char *, struct path *, unsigned int);
 
 extern struct dentry *lookup_one_len(const char *, struct dentry *, int);
 extern struct dentry *lookup_one_len_unlocked(const char *, struct dentry *, int);
+struct qstr;
+extern struct dentry *lookup_hash(const struct qstr *, struct dentry *, unsigned int);
 
 extern int follow_down_one(struct path *);
 extern int follow_down(struct path *);

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-17 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160224135552.GB8422@zenon.in.qult.net>
2016-02-26 19:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] OverlayFS: Fix checking permissions during lookup Vivek Goyal
2016-02-27 10:40   ` Nazarov Sergey
2016-02-29 16:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2016-02-28 11:09   ` Ignacy Gawędzki
2016-02-29 16:25     ` Vivek Goyal
2016-02-29 16:54       ` Ignacy Gawędzki
2016-03-17 15:23         ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160317152301.GQ8655@tucsk \
    --to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ignacy.gawedzki@green-communications.fr \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).