From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 05:22:53 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: add file_dentry()
Message-ID: <20160321052252.GG17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <1458205323-25685-1-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu>
 <20160321050215.GD3331@thunk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160321050215.GD3331@thunk.org>
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:02:15AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> I have this patch in the ext4.git tree, but I'd like to get an
> Acked-by from Al before I send a pull request to Linus.
> 
> Al?  Any objections to my sending in this change via the ext4 tree?
> 						- Ted

FWIW, I would rather add DCACHE_OP_REAL (set at d_set_d_op()
time) and turned that into

static inline struct dentry *d_real(const struct dentry *dentry)
{
	if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_NATIVE_DENTRY))
		returd dentry->d_op->d_real(dentry);
	else
		return dentry;
}
static inline struct dentry *file_dentry(const struct file *file)
{
	return d_real(file->f_path.dentry);
}

and used ovl_dentry_real as ->d_real for overlayfs.  Miklos, do you
see any problems with that variant?