From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:45:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160321124522.GC23066@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458561998-126622-2-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
On Mon 21-03-16 15:06:36, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago
> with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with
> bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
>
> This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
>
> We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
> PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_*
> or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the
> border between fs and mm.
>
> Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
> breakage to be doable.
>
> Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not.
>
> The changes are pretty straight-forward:
>
> - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
>
> - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
>
> - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
>
> - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
>
> - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
>
> This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
> script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
> I've called spatch for them manually.
>
> The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
> PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
>
> There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.
> I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation
> also will be addressed with the separate patch.
>
> virtual patch
>
> @@
> expression E;
> @@
> - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
> + E
>
> @@
> expression E;
> @@
> - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
> + E
>
> @@
> @@
> - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
> + PAGE_SHIFT
>
> @@
> @@
> - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
> + PAGE_SIZE
>
> @@
> @@
> - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
> + PAGE_MASK
>
> @@
> expression E;
> @@
> - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
> + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
>
> @@
> expression E;
> @@
> - page_cache_get(E)
> + get_page(E)
>
> @@
> expression E;
> @@
> - page_cache_release(E)
> + put_page(E)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
It is great to see PAGE_CACHE_* going away finally.
It is even better that a large part of the removal could be automated.
The semantic patch makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks!
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-21 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 12:06 [PATCH 0/3] fs, mm: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, fs: " Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-21 12:45 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-03-21 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-21 17:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, fs: remove remaining PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} usage Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-21 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: drop PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} definition Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-21 12:53 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-21 16:25 ` [PATCH 0/3] fs, mm: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros Christoph Lameter
2016-03-21 16:34 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-21 16:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-03-21 17:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-21 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-03-22 10:41 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-22 15:20 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160321124522.GC23066@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).