linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Subject: Re: DAX data corruption for mmaped and written files
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:37:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160324223747.GA15002@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160324131223.GJ4025@quack.suse.cz>

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 02:12:23PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> yesterday I have been stress-testing mmap code with my new fault locking
> patches and I have found a data corruption issue when file is written both
> via mmap and standard write(2). The problem is following:
> 
> CPU1					CPU2
> dax_io()				dax_fault()
>   get_block() - allocates block
>   ...					  get_block() - finds allocated block
> 					    - zeroes it inside fs
> 					  fault completese
> 
>   if (buffer_unwritten(bh) || buffer_new(bh)) -> new buffer
>     dax_new_buf() -> zeroes buffer which may
> 		     overwrite user data
> 
> In some cases the race can also go the other way around and we lose data
> written by write.
> 
> So either we need to do the zeroing inside fs also for write(2) path (but
> that would essentially mean we would write the block twice for each
> allocating write) or we would need dax_io() to also use radix tree locking
> to serialize against page faults (in the same way page cache does this with
> page lock). Any opinion on what would be better?

If the radix tree locking is essentially trying to be analogous to the page
lock, and the page lock is already used to serialize I/O vs page faults for
the page cache case, I guess doing that same serialization using our new DAX
locking seems like a natural fit.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-24 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-24 13:12 DAX data corruption for mmaped and written files Jan Kara
2016-03-24 22:37 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2016-03-28 22:39 ` Dave Chinner
2016-03-31 13:47   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160324223747.GA15002@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).