linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] block: wire blkdev_fallocate() to block_device_operations' reserve_space
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:04:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412200459.GA10730@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460479373-63317-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 12 2016 at 12:42P -0400,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> This is v2 of the XFS and block device reservation experiment. The
> significant changes in v2 are that the bdev interface has been condensed
> to a single callback function, the XFS transaction reservation
> management has been reworked to make transactions responsible for
> tracking and releasing excess reservation (for non-delalloc cases) and a
> workaround for the fallocate over-reservation issue is included. Beyond
> that, this version adds a bunch of miscellaneous cleanups and fixes some
> of the nastier locking/leak issues present in the first rfc.
> 
> Patches 1-2 refactor some XFS reserve pool and block accounting code in
> preparation for subsequent patches. Patches 3-5 add block/device-mapper
> reservation support. Patches 6-10 add the core reservation
> infrastructure and management bits to XFS. See the link to the original
> rfc below for instructions and further details around the purpose of
> this series.
> 
> Finally, note that this is still highly experimental/theoretical and
> should not be used on production systems. Thoughts, reviews, flames
> appreciated.

Thanks for carrying on with this work Brian.

I've started to review your patchset and Darrick's fallocate patchset.
I've pushed a branch to linux-dm.git that combines the 2, see:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-fallocate

and then added this RFC patch, at the end, which relies on both of your
patchsets -- you'll see blkdev_ensure_space_exists() has a FIXME which
implies it isn't much more than simply stubbed out at this point
(completely untested):

From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:54:31 -0400
Subject: [RFC PATCH] block: wire blkdev_fallocate() to block_device_operations' reserve_space

This effectively exposes the primitive for "ensure space exists".  It
relies on block_device_operations' reserve_space method.

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-lib.c        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/block_dev.c         | 20 +++++++++++---------
 include/linux/blkdev.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 9dca6bb..5042a84 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -314,3 +314,29 @@ int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	return __blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, sector, nr_sects, gfp_mask);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_zeroout);
+
+/**
+ * blkdev_ensure_space_exists - preallocate a block range
+ * @bdev:	blockdev to preallocate space for
+ * @sector:	start sector
+ * @nr_sects:	number of sectors to preallocate
+ * @gfp_mask:	memory allocation flags (for bio_alloc)
+ * @flags:	FALLOC_FL_* to control behaviour
+ *
+ * Description:
+ *    Ensure space exists, or is preallocated, for the sectors in question.
+ */
+int blkdev_ensure_space_exists(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
+		sector_t nr_sects, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	sector_t res;
+	const struct block_device_operations *ops = bdev->bd_disk->fops;
+
+	if (!ops->reserve_space)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	// FIXME: check with Brian Foster on whether it makes sense to
+	// use BDEV_RES_GET/BDEV_RES_MOD instead of BDEV_RES_PROVISION?
+	return ops->reserve_space(bdev, BDEV_RES_PROVISION, sector, nr_sects, &res);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_ensure_space_exists);
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 5a2c3ab..b34c07b 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1801,17 +1801,13 @@ long blkdev_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t start, loff_t len)
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	struct address_space *mapping;
 	loff_t end = start + len - 1;
-	loff_t bs_mask, isize;
+	loff_t isize;
 	int error;
 
 	/* We only support zero range and punch hole. */
 	if (mode & ~BLKDEV_FALLOC_FL_SUPPORTED)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	/* We haven't a primitive for "ensure space exists" right now. */
-	if (!(mode & ~FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
 	/* Only punch if the device can do zeroing discard. */
 	if ((mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) &&
 	    (!blk_queue_discard(q) || !q->limits.discard_zeroes_data))
@@ -1829,9 +1825,12 @@ long blkdev_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t start, loff_t len)
 			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	/* Don't allow IO that isn't aligned to logical block size */
-	bs_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
-	if ((start | len) & bs_mask)
+	/*
+	 * Don't allow IO that isn't aligned to minimum IO size (io_min)
+	 * - for normal device's io_min is usually logical block size
+	 * - but for more exotic devices (e.g. DM thinp) it may be larger
+	 */
+	if ((start | len) % bdev_io_min(bdev))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* Invalidate the page cache, including dirty pages. */
@@ -1839,7 +1838,10 @@ long blkdev_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t start, loff_t len)
 	truncate_inode_pages_range(mapping, start, end);
 
 	error = -EINVAL;
-	if (mode & FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE)
+	if (!(mode & ~FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE))
+		error = blkdev_ensure_space_exists(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9,
+						   mode);
+	else if (mode & FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE)
 		error = blkdev_issue_zeroout(bdev, start >> 9, len >> 9,
 					    GFP_KERNEL, false);
 	else if (mode & FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 6c6ea96..4147af2 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -1132,6 +1132,8 @@ extern int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, struct page *page);
 extern int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, bool discard);
+extern int blkdev_ensure_space_exists(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
+		sector_t nr_sects, unsigned long flags);
 static inline int sb_issue_discard(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block,
 		sector_t nr_blocks, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags)
 {
-- 
2.6.4 (Apple Git-63)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-12 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12 16:42 [RFC v2 PATCH 00/10] dm-thin/xfs: prototype a block reservation allocation model Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 01/10] xfs: refactor xfs_reserve_blocks() to handle ENOSPC correctly Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 02/10] xfs: replace xfs_mod_fdblocks() bool param with flags Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 03/10] block: add block_device_operations methods to set and get reserved space Brian Foster
2016-04-14  0:32   ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 04/10] dm: add " Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 05/10] dm thin: " Brian Foster
2016-04-13 17:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-13 18:33     ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13 20:41       ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13 21:01         ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-14 15:10         ` Mike Snitzer
2016-04-14 16:23           ` Brian Foster
2016-04-14 20:18             ` Mike Snitzer
2016-04-15 11:48               ` Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 06/10] xfs: thin block device reservation mechanism Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 07/10] xfs: adopt a reserved allocation model on dm-thin devices Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 08/10] xfs: handle bdev reservation ENOSPC correctly from XFS reserved pool Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 09/10] xfs: support no block reservation transaction mode Brian Foster
2016-04-12 16:42 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 10/10] xfs: use contiguous bdev reservation for file preallocation Brian Foster
2016-04-12 20:04 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2016-04-12 20:39   ` [RFC PATCH] block: wire blkdev_fallocate() to block_device_operations' reserve_space Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-12 20:46     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-04-12 22:25       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-12 21:04     ` Mike Snitzer
2016-04-13  0:12       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-14 15:18         ` Mike Snitzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160412200459.GA10730@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).