linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] writeback: minor tweaks
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:08:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160413000857.GB10643@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460486633-26099-1-git-send-email-axboe@fb.com>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:43:50PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Three top level patches out of the writeback throttling patchset, that
> I think should make it into mainline. No functional changes in the
> first two patches, and the last patch just bumps reclaim/sync
> writeback to use WRITE_SYNC as a hint to the block layer.

Whatever happened to adding a new flag to indicate that write
requests can be throttled, rather than overloading WRITE_SYNC with
yet another (conflicting) meaning?

I've already pointed out the problems associated with tagging async,
bulk writes as synchronous writes so that a lower layer can avoid
throttling them. Please add a new flag for communicating whether
writes can be throttled to the block layer instead of reusing
WRITE_SYNC.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-13  0:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12 18:43 [PATCH 0/3] writeback: minor tweaks Jens Axboe
2016-04-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] writeback: propagate the various reasons for writeback Jens Axboe
2016-04-13  9:48   ` Jan Kara
2016-04-14 15:43     ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-17 12:01       ` Jan Kara
2016-04-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] writeback: add wbc_to_write() Jens Axboe
2016-04-13  9:50   ` Jan Kara
2016-04-14 15:41     ` Jens Axboe
2016-04-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] writeback: use WRITE_SYNC for reclaim or sync writeback Jens Axboe
2016-04-13  0:08 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-04-13  1:49   ` [PATCH 0/3] writeback: minor tweaks Jens Axboe
2016-04-13  6:09     ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 10:07     ` Jan Kara
2016-04-14 15:41       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160413000857.GB10643@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).