From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available
Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 22:46:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509024617.GA4646@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160509014543.GS18496@dastard>
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 11:45:43AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [ OT, but I'll reply anyway :P ]
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:29:23PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:56:02AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > In the latest XFS filesystem format, we randomise the generation
> > > value during every inode allocation to make it hard to guess the
> > > handle of adjacent inodes from an existing ino+gen pair, or even
> > > from life time to life time of the same inode.
> >
> > The one thing I wonder about is whether that increases the probability
> > of a filehandle collision (where you accidentally generate the same
> > filehandle for two different files).
>
> Not possible - inode number is still different between the two
> files. i.e. ino+gen makes the handle unique, not gen.
>
> > If the generation number is a 32-bit counter per inode number (is that
> > actually the way filesystems work?), then it takes 2^32 reuses of the
> > inode number to hit the same filehandle.
>
> 4 billion unlink/create operations that hit the same inode number
> are going to take some time. I suspect someone will notice the load
> generated by an attmept to brute force this sort of thing ;)
>
> > If you choose it randomly then
> > you expect a collision after about 2^16 reuses.
>
> I'm pretty sure that a random search will need to, on average,
> search half the keyspace before a match is found (i.e. 2^31
> attempts, not 2^16).
Yeah, but I was wondering whether you could somehow get into the
situation where clients between then are caching N distinct filehandles
with the same inode number. Then a collision becomes likely around
2^16, by the usual birthday paradox rule-of-thumb.
Uh, but now that I think of it that's irrelevant. At most one of those
filehandles actually refers to a still-existing file. Any attempt to
use the other 2^16-1 should return -ESTALE. So collisions among that
set don't matter, it's only collisions involving the existing file that
are interesting. So, nevermind, I can't see a practical way to hit a
problem here....
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 12:57 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Enhanced file stat system call David Howells
2016-04-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available David Howells
2016-05-02 22:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2016-05-03 15:53 ` David Howells
2016-05-04 22:56 ` Dave Chinner
2016-05-05 0:09 ` NeilBrown
2016-05-05 19:48 ` Jeff Layton
2016-05-06 18:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-05-05 20:04 ` David Howells
2016-05-06 1:39 ` Dave Chinner
2016-05-06 18:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-05-09 1:45 ` Dave Chinner
2016-05-09 2:46 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2016-05-04 23:56 ` NeilBrown
2016-05-08 8:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-09 12:02 ` Jeff Layton
2016-05-10 7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-10 13:21 ` Jeff Layton
2016-05-09 12:57 ` David Howells
2016-05-09 13:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-05-10 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-10 8:25 ` David Howells
2016-05-12 9:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-13 15:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-23 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-23 9:33 ` David Howells
2016-05-18 10:55 ` David Howells
2016-05-09 13:00 ` David Howells
2016-05-09 13:38 ` David Howells
2016-05-10 7:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-10 8:43 ` David Howells
2016-05-12 9:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-09 13:40 ` David Howells
2016-04-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] statx: AFS: Return enhanced file attributes David Howells
2016-04-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] statx: Ext4: " David Howells
2016-05-02 22:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2016-05-03 20:24 ` David Howells
2016-05-08 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] statx: NFS: " David Howells
2016-05-02 22:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2016-04-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] statx: Make windows attributes available for CIFS, NTFS and FAT to use David Howells
2016-05-02 22:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2016-10-03 21:03 ` Steve French
2016-05-03 20:23 ` David Howells
2016-05-08 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] statx: CIFS: Return enhanced attributes David Howells
2016-04-30 21:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Enhanced file stat system call Jeff Layton
2016-05-04 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-05 22:54 ` Steve French
2016-05-06 2:00 ` Steve French
2016-05-09 13:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-13 14:28 ` Richard Sharpe
2016-05-13 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509024617.GA4646@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-afs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).