From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 15:28:21 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
	Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Mitko Haralanov <mitko.haralanov@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] IB/hfi1: Add ioctl() interface for user commands
Message-ID: <20160512212821.GC6545@obsidianresearch.com>
References: <20160512171115.6198.77458.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com>
 <20160512171846.6198.31415.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com>
 <20160512174332.GB13553@obsidianresearch.com>
 <20160512192726.GB15146@phlsvsds.ph.intel.com>
 <20160512194006.GA6364@obsidianresearch.com>
 <f96bfe93-6bcc-7d55-8f7a-1792d12d41d9@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f96bfe93-6bcc-7d55-8f7a-1792d12d41d9@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:48:16PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> were going to rip out the EEPROM code.  In any case, the best fix would
> be to rebase the two series that are remaining and move any "rip out
> things like eeprom support" patches to prior to the ioctl patches and
> make it so that they rip out the write interface version of it instead,
> and then squash a second copy of the ioctl removal into this patch.

Yes, this would look best

Jason