From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:43816 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755651AbcETQkP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2016 12:40:15 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:39678 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27031864AbcETQkNfwsQd (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:13 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:08 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, James Hogan , Paul.Burton@imgtec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ELF/MIPS build fix Message-ID: <20160520164008.GC13016@linux-mips.org> References: <20160520141705.GA1913@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 05:37:17PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > CONFIG_MIPS32_N32=y but CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF disabled results in the following > > linker errors: > > Is this for a configuration with native (n64) ELF disabled, but one or > more compat ELF formats (o32, n32) enabled? An interesting use case then. Yes. Fairly sensible for one of those systems where we only support 64 bit kernels but don't need a 64 bit userland. Ralf