linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* pwrite04 ltp bug?
@ 2016-05-20 20:51 Mike Marshall
  2016-05-21 11:43 ` Eryu Guan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Marshall @ 2016-05-20 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-fsdevel, Mike Marshall

Hi everyone...

While fixing a couple of LTP regressions in the out-of-tree Orangefs
kernel module, I think I found a problem with the pwrite04 test,
here's what I think was meant:

# git diff testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
index b297682..4ca7dc1 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
@@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ int main(int ac, char *av[])

                }
                if (statbuf.st_size != K5) {
-                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K4",
+                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K5",
                                 statbuf.st_size);
-
+                       cleanup();
                }
                tst_resm(TPASS, "O_APPEND test passed.");

Should I even be talking about this here, or should I go find
the github maintainers of LTP and ask them about it?

-Mike

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: pwrite04 ltp bug?
  2016-05-20 20:51 pwrite04 ltp bug? Mike Marshall
@ 2016-05-21 11:43 ` Eryu Guan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eryu Guan @ 2016-05-21 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Marshall; +Cc: linux-fsdevel

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:51:30PM -0400, Mike Marshall wrote:
> Hi everyone...
> 
> While fixing a couple of LTP regressions in the out-of-tree Orangefs
> kernel module, I think I found a problem with the pwrite04 test,
> here's what I think was meant:
> 
> # git diff testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> index b297682..4ca7dc1 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> @@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ int main(int ac, char *av[])
> 
>                 }
>                 if (statbuf.st_size != K5) {
> -                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K4",
> +                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K5",
>                                  statbuf.st_size);
> -
> +                       cleanup();
>                 }
>                 tst_resm(TPASS, "O_APPEND test passed.");
> 
> Should I even be talking about this here, or should I go find
> the github maintainers of LTP and ask them about it?

Can you please send a patch to ltp list (ltp@lists.linux.it)? That's
where ltp developments and discussions happen.

Thanks,
Eryu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-21 11:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-20 20:51 pwrite04 ltp bug? Mike Marshall
2016-05-21 11:43 ` Eryu Guan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).