From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:36413 "EHLO mail-oi0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752767AbcIGMcN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:32:13 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id w78so23032945oie.3 for ; Wed, 07 Sep 2016 05:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 07:32:10 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: Miklos Szeredi , fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael j Theall , Jean-Pierre =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support for posix ACLs in fuse Message-ID: <20160907123210.GB70121@ubuntu-hedt> References: <1472478397-131967-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <87r38wo056.fsf@vostro.rath.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r38wo056.fsf@vostro.rath.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:32:21PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hi Seth, > > On Aug 29 2016, Seth Forshee wrote: > > Hi Miklos, > > > > Here's an updated set of patches for supporting posix ACLs in fuse. I > > think I've incorporated all the feedback from the last RFC series, and > > so I've dropped the RFC this time. > > > > I also pushed to github the changes I made to libfuse for testing this. > > They're a little rough and probably not 100% complete, but it is > > sufficient for exercising the functionality of these patches with > > fusexmp. > > > > https://github.com/sforshee/libfuse/tree/posix-acl > > I think it would be great to finally have this in FUSE. Thanks for > working on this! > > Would you mind submitting a pull request for the userspace changes to > libfuse as well (via GitHub)? I can, I'll just have to find some time first to make sure I've covered everything and to clean it all up. Seth