From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48032 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751790AbcINHIf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 03:08:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:08:32 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ross Zwisler , Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] iomap: add IOMAP_F_NEW flag Message-ID: <20160914070832.GB17278@lst.de> References: <1473438884-674-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1473438884-674-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160913224357.GA26002@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160913224357.GA26002@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:43:57PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:34:35PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler > > Though I guess I've never seen a patch with a completely empty changelog > before? :) Maybe it's okay for really easy patches? I just thought I'd get > shouted down for doing it. I think it's ok and others do it a lot too (e.g. Al Viro). But I've been shouted at for it from others nevertheless..